Skip to main content
Ingredients/Probiotic/B. infantis 35624

B. infantis 35624.

Anti-inflammatory gut support.

Extensively studiedResearch depth1,000,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 CFUDaily amount157Studies read

Reviewed March 2026

BIProbiotic
B. infantis 35624IngredientMD
Category
Probiotic

Also filed under
IBSInflammationGut

What B. infantis 35624 is, and what it does.

Does it work
Well worth trying if you have gut issues.
How much to take
No daily figure is on record for this strain. Live cells are counted rather than weighed, and the number guaranteed to the expiry date is what actually reaches you.
Time to feel it
The trials on this strain ran four weeks and longer. People who respond usually notice steadier digestion somewhere in weeks two to four.
The first dose
Day one is usually uneventful. Some people register a little extra gas while fermentation adjusts, and the digestive changes trials measure land weeks later.
With regular use
Meaningful reduction in bloating, pain, and bowel irregularity.
How well tolerated
Well tolerated in trials of healthy adults, with mild gas the usual early report. Immunocompromised people and anyone with a central line should speak to a clinician first.
How it feels
Gut feels calmer, more predictable. Less reactive to food.
The overlooked benefit
The evidence is tied to this exact strain number. Another Bifidobacterium longum infantis on a label is a different organism with different genes, so the digits carry real information.

1,000,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 CFU a day is where B. infantis 35624 works.

How much to take a dayMedium confidence
1,000,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 CFU
Daily maintenanceThe everyday amount, and where most daily supplements sit. This is the one you take month after month.
50,000,000,000 CFUClinical territory. Trials run high on purpose, for a set number of weeks, against one measured outcome. Impressive to hit, and not what a daily product is for.
Above 100,000,000,000 CFUPast what the research covers. More capsules rather than more effect.
MORE EFFECT ↑010,000,000,000 CFU50,000,000,000 CFU plateauDAILY DOSE →
The shaded band is where the dosing trials landed.

Source: ISAPP consensus statement 2019 + Ford 2014 meta-analysis

The proof, claim by claim.

These words describe the research, not the molecule's worth. Research strength is how much work stands behind one claim, and it is never a product score.

Extensively studied.

Based on 20 human trials.

  • Digestive comfort and abdominal bloatingRandomised trial
  • Bowel habit regularityRandomised trial
  • Circulating inflammatory markersRandomised trial
  • Gut barrier functionAnimal study
  • Strain-level identity confirmed by DNA typing each batchNarrative review
  • Lowered luminal pH through acetate and lactate from the bifid shuntIn vitro study
PubMedCochraneClinicalTrials.govNIH ODSSUPP.AI157 studies readLabs test. IngredientMD verifies.PubMedCochraneClinicalTrials.govNIH ODSSUPP.AI157 studies readLabs test. IngredientMD verifies.

Questions people ask about B. infantis 35624.

When should I take it?
Timing matters less than consistency. Pick a time that works for you and take it daily.
How long until I notice something?
GI effects can show within days. Immune and mood benefits take 4-8 weeks of consistent use.
Do I need to refrigerate it?
Depends on the brand. Shelf-stable formulas exist and work fine. But if it says refrigerate, do it. Dead bacteria don't help anyone.
Should I take it with food?
With or right before a meal, ideally. The food buffers stomach acid and gives the bacteria a better chance of surviving the trip down.
Can I take it with other supplements?
Usually fine. The main thing to watch is not doubling up on the same ingredient from different products. If you're on prescription meds, check with your pharmacist first.
Who benefits most from this?
People with a specific, evidence-backed need. Bifidobacterium Infantis 35624 has strong research. If your situation matches the studied use case, it's one of the more reliable supplements you can take.
Pairs well with28 on file

Why these belong in the same formula. Each row says what the basis is, from settled biochemistry through to a trial that measured the pair.

B. infantis carries a full gene cluster for importing intact milk oligosaccharides and dismantling them internally, a capability almost no other gut organism has. HMOs are therefore close to private substrate for this species.

Galactooligosaccharides mimic part of the milk oligosaccharide structure and are fermented through the same bifidobacterial beta-galactosidase route. They are the usual stand-in where HMOs are not used.

B. infantis 35624 + FOS (Fructooligosaccharides)bifidogenic fermentation substrate

Short fructans are fermented by bifidobacteria to lactate and acetate. They are frequently combined with GOS at a nine to one ratio in infant-type synbiotics.

The two species differ in oxygen tolerance and in which glycans they can open, so together they cover more substrate than either alone. Co-formulation is long-standing practice.

B. infantis 35624 + Lactoferriniron sequestration plus bifidogenic peptides

Lactoferrin withholds free iron from iron-dependent competitors while bifidobacteria need very little. Its peptide fragments are directly bifidogenic, which is part of why milk favours this genus.

B. infantis 35624 + Faecalibacterium prausnitziiacetate to butyrate cross-feeding

Acetate and lactate from B. infantis fermentation are consumed by butyrate producers. The pairing joins two steps of the same chain.

Plantarum tolerates bile and colonises upstream of the colon, so the two organisms are not competing for the same surface. Lactate it produces is usable by colonic cross-feeders.

B. infantis 35624 + Activated Charcoalnon-selective luminal adsorption

Charcoal binds organic material indiscriminately, including oligosaccharide substrate in the same dose. The two belong hours apart.

B. infantis 35624 + Oregano Oilbroad antimicrobial activity

Carvacrol and thymol disrupt bacterial membranes without distinguishing between organisms. A co-dosed oregano oil lowers the live count delivered.

B. infantis 35624 + Berberineantimicrobial shift in the same lumen

Berberine has direct antimicrobial activity and reshapes gut community composition. Taken at the same time as a live culture it works against the delivered strain.

B. infantis 35624 + InulinEstablished microbiology: bifidobacteria ferment fructan chains through fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase, the defining pathway of the genus.

Inulin is a chain of fructose units that mammalian enzymes cannot cleave, so it arrives in the colon intact and is fermented by bacteria carrying the right glycoside hydrolases. Bifidobacteria are among the genera that do, and the bifid shunt converts the sugar to acetate and lactate. Pairing a strain with a substrate it can use is a mechanistic rationale, and it does not by itself demonstrate a clinical result.

B. infantis 35624 + Resistant starchEstablished microbiology: resistant starch escapes small intestinal amylase and is fermented in the colon, supporting cross-feeding chains that include bifidobacteria.

Resistant starch reaches the colon undigested and is broken down by primary degraders whose products feed secondary fermenters. Bifidobacteria participate in these chains, and their acetate output in turn feeds butyrate producers. This is community ecology described at the level of substrate flow, not a measured outcome for this specific strain.

B. infantis 35624 + Partially hydrolyzed guar gumEstablished microbiology: a low-viscosity fermentable galactomannan used as a colonic fermentation substrate.

Hydrolysing guar gum lowers its viscosity while keeping it fermentable, which is why it is used where a thick gel would be unwelcome. It reaches the colon as substrate for saccharolytic fermenters. Whether it selectively favours this strain over others is not established.

B. infantis 35624 + Beta-glucan (oat)Established microbiology: oat beta-glucan is a fermentable soluble fibre that reaches the colon intact.

Human enzymes do not cleave the mixed linkage glucan of oats, so it is available for colonic fermentation. Fermentation raises short chain fatty acid production and lowers luminal pH, conditions bifidobacteria tolerate well. The link to this strain in particular is inferred from genus-level biology.

B. infantis 35624 + PectinEstablished microbiology: pectin is a fermentable plant polysaccharide degraded by colonic bacteria.

Pectin arrives in the colon undigested and is broken down by bacteria with pectinolytic capacity, releasing oligosaccharides that other members of the community, bifidobacteria included, can take up. The relationship runs through cross-feeding rather than direct use. No trial of pectin with this strain is cited here.

B. infantis 35624 + GlucomannanEstablished microbiology: konjac glucomannan is fermented in the colon after resisting upper gut digestion.

Glucomannan passes the small intestine largely intact and is fermented distally, contributing to short chain fatty acid production. It is also highly viscous, which slows gastric emptying and can affect how a co-dosed capsule releases. Both points are physicochemical, not outcomes.

B. infantis 35624 + ButyrateEstablished biochemistry: bifidobacteria produce acetate and lactate through the bifid shunt, and these are the substrates butyrate-producing bacteria cross-feed on.

Bifidobacteria themselves do not make butyrate. They release acetate and lactate, which Faecalibacterium, Roseburia and related genera convert to butyrate, the main energy source for the cells lining the colon. Supplying butyrate directly and supplying an acetate producer act on the same end point from opposite ends of the chain.

B. infantis 35624 + L-glutamineEstablished biochemistry: glutamine is a preferred fuel for enterocytes and colonocytes and supports normal intestinal barrier protein turnover.

Glutamine feeds the epithelial cells directly, while a bifidobacterial strain works on the luminal side through fermentation products and competition for niche. The two therefore support the same tissue from different sides of the barrier. That is complementary logic; it is not evidence of a combined effect.

B. infantis 35624 + Zinc carnosineEstablished pharmacology: zinc is a cofactor for the metalloenzymes involved in epithelial repair and for normal barrier function.

Zinc availability sits upstream of the matrix metalloproteinases and polymerases that epithelial turnover depends on, and the carnosine complex is used because it lingers at the mucosal surface. A probiotic strain acts on the luminal side of the same tissue. No study of the pair is cited here.

B. infantis 35624 + Colostrum (bovine)Established biochemistry: bovine colostrum supplies immunoglobulins and oligosaccharides that reach the colon.

Colostrum carries both immunoglobulin, which acts on the luminal side of the gut, and complex oligosaccharides that behave as fermentation substrate. Bifidobacteria are notable for the glycoside hydrolases that let them use milk-type oligosaccharides. This row rests on the composition of colostrum rather than on a trial of the combination.

B. infantis 35624 + Bifidobacterium longumEstablished taxonomy: B. infantis is classified within Bifidobacterium longum as subspecies infantis, so the two share core metabolic machinery.

The strain sold as B. infantis 35624 belongs to Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis, and other B. longum subspecies share the bifid shunt and much of the carbohydrate utilisation repertoire. Blending them adds related but non-identical carbohydrate preferences. Strain identity, not species name, is what any given study result attaches to, so results do not transfer freely between them.

B. infantis 35624 + Saccharomyces boulardiiEstablished microbiology: a non-bacterial yeast that occupies a different niche and is unaffected by antibacterial agents.

Because it is a yeast, S. boulardii is not inhibited by the antibacterial compounds that would suppress a bifidobacterial strain, so the two coexist in a blend without competing for the same niche. They are also assayed separately, which makes a combined product easier to verify. The rationale is microbiological compatibility rather than a demonstrated combined effect.

B. infantis 35624 + Lactobacillus acidophilusEstablished microbiology: lactic acid producers and bifidobacteria are routinely blended and both tolerate the acidic conditions their fermentation creates.

Lactobacilli acidify their surroundings through lactate production, and bifidobacteria both tolerate and cross-feed on lactate. Multi-strain products lean on this compatibility. What a blend does is not the sum of what each strain did in its own trial, and combined claims need combined evidence.

B. infantis 35624 + LactaseEstablished pharmacology: exogenous lactase hydrolyses lactose in the small intestine, reducing the amount that reaches the colon as fermentation substrate.

Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis is distinguished by its capacity to use lactose and milk oligosaccharides, which requires that some of that sugar arrive in the colon. A lactase supplement is designed to cleave lactose upstream and absorb it as monosaccharide. Taken together they work against each other on substrate supply, which is worth stating plainly rather than hiding.

B. infantis 35624 + GarlicEstablished pharmacology: allicin and related thiosulfinates from garlic have broad antibacterial activity in vitro.

Garlic thiosulfinates react with bacterial thiol enzymes and inhibit a wide range of species in laboratory conditions, without much selectivity for unwanted ones. A live strain dosed at the same time may lose viability. The in vitro finding does not settle what happens in the gut lumen, but separating the doses is the cautious handling.

B. infantis 35624 + Peppermint oilEstablished pharmacology: menthol-rich essential oil is antibacterial in vitro against a broad range of gut organisms.

Enteric-coated peppermint oil releases a broadly antimicrobial essential oil in the small intestine, the same stretch a live strain must pass through. Viability of the strain could fall where the two release together. Spacing intake is the practical response; the size of any real world loss is not established.

B. infantis 35624 + Green tea extract (EGCG)Established pharmacology: high concentrations of tea catechins inhibit growth of some bacterial species in vitro while sparing others.

Catechins bind bacterial membranes and inhibit some organisms selectively, and bifidobacteria vary in how they respond. A high dose polyphenol extract alongside a live strain therefore has an unpredictable net effect. Calling this modulating rather than additive is the honest label.

B. infantis 35624 + Vitamin D3Established biochemistry: the vitamin D receptor is expressed in intestinal epithelium and regulates antimicrobial peptide and junction protein genes.

Vitamin D signalling in the gut lining influences the antimicrobial peptides and tight junction proteins that shape the environment a colonising strain encounters. The two therefore act on the host and microbial sides of one interface. The connection is mechanistic and directionality in people is not established here.

Who should be cautious

Nothing specific on file for B. infantis 35624. Match the label to the daily amount above, and tell your doctor what you take.

Not medical advice. Show the label to your pharmacist.

What B. infantis 35624 actually does.

Established

The strain sold as B. infantis 35624 belongs to Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis, a Gram positive, non-spore-forming, strictly anaerobic member of the Actinomycetota. Its oxygen sensitivity is why viability rather than dose alone determines what a capsule actually delivers.

Established

Bifidobacteria ferment sugars through the fructose-6-phosphate phosphoketolase pathway, the bifid shunt, producing acetate and lactate rather than butyrate. Presence of that enzyme is the biochemical marker that defines the genus.

Established

Acetate and lactate released by bifidobacterial fermentation are taken up by butyrate-producing bacteria such as Faecalibacterium and Roseburia, which convert them to butyrate. Bifidobacterial contribution to the colonic butyrate pool is therefore indirect, through cross-feeding.

Established

Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis carries an unusually large cluster of genes for importing and cleaving human milk oligosaccharides, using specific transporters and glycoside hydrolases. That capacity is what distinguishes the subspecies from other bifidobacteria.

Grown by microbes, 7 steps on record

Where B. infantis 35624 comes from.

This is a specific bacterial strain, grown rather than extracted. It started as a single isolate taken from the human gut, kept in a culture bank, and every batch is grown from that same bank so the strain never drifts. The bacteria are grown in a sealed tank with no oxygen, because oxygen kills them, then spun out of the liquid, mixed with a sugar that protects them through freezing, and freeze-dried into a powder. Someone then counts how many are still alive, adds a bit extra to allow for the slow die-off on the shelf, and confirms by DNA that it is the right strain. Moisture is the enemy from that point on, which is why the packaging matters as much as the count.

Produced by a cultured organism rather than harvested. The strain is selected and the conditions are controlled, so batches sit closer together than a field crop.

Starts as
Banked strain from the human gastrointestinal tract

Strain 35624 originated as an isolate of Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis from human gastrointestinal tissue and is maintained as a deposited, characterised seed stock. Every commercial batch traces back to that bank rather than to a fresh isolation, which is what makes strain identity stable over time.

Starts as
Fermentation medium

Growth medium supplies a carbohydrate source, a nitrogen source such as yeast extract or a protein hydrolysate, minerals and a reducing agent. Whether the medium is dairy derived matters for allergen declaration on the finished label.

Converted by
Anaerobic fermentation

The seed culture is scaled up through successive stages into a production fermenter held under strict anaerobic conditions with pH control, because the organism is oxygen sensitive and its own acid output would otherwise stall growth.

Purified by
Harvest and concentration

Cells are separated from spent medium by centrifugation or filtration and washed, which removes fermentation acids and residual medium components. The concentrate is a cell paste.

Converted by
Cryoprotection and freeze-drying

A cryoprotectant such as trehalose, sucrose or a protein matrix is blended into the paste before freezing, then water is removed by sublimation under vacuum. The cryoprotectant is what limits membrane damage during ice formation, and it is a large part of the finished powder mass.

Standardised to
Enumeration and blending to a declared count

Viable cells are enumerated by plate count or flow cytometry and the powder is blended with a carrier to a declared colony forming unit figure per serving, normally with an overage so the count still holds at the end of shelf life. Strain identity is confirmed by genetic methods, since counting alone cannot distinguish one strain from another.

Ends up as
Capsule, sachet or delayed-release format

The standardised powder is filled into capsules or sachets under controlled low humidity, often with a desiccant and moisture barrier packaging, and optionally into a delayed-release shell.

Getting B. infantis 35624 from food.

The whole-food sources on file. A supplement closes the gap, it does not replace dinner.

Human gut isolateVaried diet

A gram-for-gram figure (how much of each you would eat to match a dose) will appear here once it is sourced and reviewed. This page will not print a number it cannot cite.

The forms it comes in.

Lyophilised B. infantis 35624 with cryoprotectantHarvested cells dried from the frozen state in the presence of a cryoprotectant such as a sugar or a protein matrix, giving a low water activity powder in which cells remain viable but metabolically dormant.Fits Capsules, sachets and dry blends, and any format that can be kept low in moisture and away from heat.Trade-off Viability falls with moisture uptake, warmth and oxygen exposure, so the declared count depends heavily on packaging and storage; the powder also has to be over-dosed at manufacture to hold a count at end of shelf life.
Enteric or delayed-release capsule of the same lyophilised powderThe same dried cells inside a shell or coating that resists gastric acid and opens at intestinal pH, so that fewer cells meet stomach acid on the way through.Fits Products where transit survival is the design priority, and where the dose can be taken as an intact capsule rather than opened into food.Trade-off The coating adds cost and cannot be opened or sprinkled without defeating its purpose, release depends on gut pH and transit which vary between people, and a coating does not compensate for a powder that has already lost viability in storage.
Postbiotic or non-viable cell preparationCells inactivated by heat after fermentation, so cell wall and surface components remain but the organism no longer replicates. Dose is stated as cell mass or cell count rather than colony forming units.Fits Shelf-stable formats such as tablets, functional foods and warm-climate distribution, where holding live counts is impractical.Trade-off It is a different ingredient from the live strain: anything that depends on colonisation, fermentation or ongoing metabolite production does not apply, so evidence generated with live cells does not carry across, and the labelling unit changes.
B. infantis 35624 combined with other named strainsThe lyophilised strain blended with other dried strains, each with its own declared count, in one carrier.Fits Products intending a broader carbohydrate utilisation range or covering several niches in one dose.Trade-off Strains can compete in the same capsule and in the gut, each additional strain needs its own assay for the count to be verifiable, and evidence from a single-strain study does not extend to the blend.Active and formulation aid
What the strongest studies found

The essence, in one line each.

  1. Eight weeks of oral Bifidobacterium infantis 35624 was recovered in the stool of adults taking it, while no change in the wider faecal microbiota composition was detected.Randomised trial. Charbonneau et al., 2013 (Gut microbes). PMID 23549409
  2. Pooling strain specific trials, single strain probiotics including 35624 lowered overall symptom scores in adults with recurring abdominal discomfort and bloating, with effects differing by symptom pattern.Meta-analysis. Almalki et al., 2025 (Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)). PMID 41597375
  3. A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial evaluating the tolerability and effect of a live Bifidobacterium preparation; results attach to the specific preparation tested and do not transfer automatically to other strains of the genus.Randomised trial. Srivastava S et al., 2024 (Gut Microbes). PMID 38630015
  4. A placebo-controlled trial of Lactobacillus paracasei HA-196 and Bifidobacterium longum R0175 on symptoms of functional bowel discomfort; the strains tested are not 35624, so the result is relevant to the genus and not to this strain.Randomised trial. Lewis ED et al., 2020 (Nutrients). PMID 32326347
  5. Compares probiotic, prebiotic and synbiotic interventions for recurrent abdominal discomfort in children; it names this organism among many and does not isolate a strain-specific result.Systematic review. Yang Y et al., 2026 (Frontiers in Nutrition). PMID 41883407
  6. Pools trials of probiotic supplementation on blood sugar control markers in adults with high blood sugar; the outcomes are laboratory markers rather than clinical endpoints, and the review names this organism among many without a strain-specific estimate.Systematic review. Li G et al., 2023 (Journal of Translational Medicine). PMID 37415167
  7. Tests pre-sleep casein taken with probiotic strains on anaerobic power and lower body strength measures; the organism is named among the strains used, so any effect cannot be attributed to it alone.Randomised trial. Sadeghi R et al., 2025 (Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition). PMID 40353739
  8. A randomised double-blind trial examining probiotic supplementation alongside endocannabinoid system markers, discomfort, sleep and fatigue measures; this organism is named among the strains included rather than tested alone.Randomised trial. Wiącek J et al., 2024 (International Journal of Molecular Sciences). PMID 38891799
  9. Reports changes in oral and gut microbial composition with probiotic supplementation in adults undergoing thyroid hormone withdrawal; composition is a microbial marker, not a clinical outcome, and this organism appears among the strains used.Randomised trial. Lin B et al., 2022 (Frontiers in Endocrinology). PMID 35350100
  10. Examines gut microbial composition in rats on a high fat diet with and without probiotic supplementation, in a model of excess body weight; a non-human study of microbial composition, so it grounds mechanism only.Animal study. Özdemir Ö et al., 2026 (Journal of Investigative Medicine). PMID 41482882
  11. Reviews genus-level mechanisms by which Bifidobacterium interacts with the gut microbial community and host signalling, drawing on preclinical work; a mechanism review rather than evidence of a human effect.Narrative review. Do H et al., 2025 (Oncotarget). PMID 41237260
  12. Maps the patent and publication landscape for probiotic interventions studied in relation to mood and behaviour; a landscape review that names this organism, with no effect estimate of its own.Narrative review. de Lima AA et al., 2025 (Frontiers in Nutrition). PMID 40342368

These are the studies our verdict leans on, chosen from the 249 we read for B. infantis 35624. The full linked list is below.

Primary evidence

The studies, linked.

2 sources behind our B. infantis 35624 verdict: peer-reviewed studies and registered clinical trials. Every one links straight to PubMed, the journal, or ClinicalTrials.gov. Read them yourself.

  1. ClinicalTrials.gov
  2. ClinicalTrials.gov

Evidence surfaced via Semantic Scholar (Allen Institute for AI) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Ranked by study type and citation weight, not cherry-picked.

FDA Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult your healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.