A specific bacteriophage strain that targets harmful gut bacteria. Part of the PreforPro phage blend. Targets and destroys specific harmful bacteria in your gut, clearing space for beneficial microbes to flourish.
Reviewed March 2026
These words describe the research, not the molecule's worth. Research strength is how much work stands behind one claim, and it is never a product score.
A pairing appears on this page only when a trial gave both ingredients together and measured the result. Myoviridae LH01 has none that clears that bar.
Stitching two separate single-ingredient studies into a pairing is the one thing this engine will not do. When a study of the combination itself holds up at source, it lands here with its citation.
No invented synergy. Where actives were studied on their own rather than together, the record shows each on its own evidence, never a combined effect no trial measured.
Research strength. Research strength says how much work stands behind the combination. It is never a product score.
Independent record. Every finding is cited to a named trial, dated, and never written by the brand.
20 pairings are live across the library today. Checked 20 July 2026.
No study gave these as a pair, so they are not in the card above. But the reason they belong together is settled biochemistry, not a guess, so it is worth knowing.
A lytic phage narrows a specific bacterial population while a probiotic adds a defined organism, so the two act from opposite directions on the same community. Phage host range is narrow and strain specific, which is the basis for pairing a coliphage with lactobacilli or bifidobacteria that it does not infect. Whether the combination produces a different community outcome than either alone is not something the available sourcing settles.
Phage attachment depends on specific surface receptors, and a phage selected against Escherichia coli has no receptor to bind on a Lactobacillus cell wall. That specificity is why coliphage preparations and lactobacillus cultures are formulated side by side. The pairing is a compatibility statement grounded in phage biology, not a demonstrated combined effect.
Bifidobacteria present a different cell envelope from Escherichia coli and carry none of the receptors a coliphage recognises. Co-formulation therefore does not put the culture at risk from the phage. What the combination does to the wider community is a separate question the sourcing here does not answer.
Bifidobacterium lactis is unaffected by a phage selected against a Gram-negative host, which makes the two compatible in one capsule. Products pair them on exactly that basis. The compatibility is established microbiology; a combined outcome is not.
Inulin feeds fermentative Gram-positive populations while a coliphage acts on a Gram-negative target, so the two push the community in the same direction by different means. Phages carry no metabolism of their own and do not consume the substrate. The pairing is a synbiotic-style rationale rather than a measured combination.
Short-chain fructans are fermented by bifidobacteria and lactobacilli and support their expansion. A lytic phage removes a specific competing population without touching the substrate. Combining a substrate for the desirable organisms with a narrow lytic agent is coherent design, and it has not been measured here as a combination.
Galactooligosaccharides are fermented efficiently by bifidobacteria, which are outside a coliphage's host range. The substrate and the phage act on different members of the community. This is a design rationale drawn from established microbiology.
Resistant starch reaches the colon intact and is fermented to short-chain fatty acids, mainly by Gram-positive fermenters. A coliphage does not compete for that substrate and does not infect those fermenters. The two occupy different roles in the same formula.
Partially hydrolysed guar gum is a slowly fermented soluble fibre used where a gentler fermentation profile is wanted. It feeds bacteria that lie outside a coliphage's host range. The combination is a synbiotic-style pairing rather than a tested one.
Tailed phages lose infectivity in strongly acidic conditions, which is why oral phage preparations rely on enteric capsules or buffering to reach the colon intact. A bicarbonate buffer raises gastric pH transiently and is one of the approaches used for acid-labile actives. Whether it improves delivery for this specific preparation has not been measured here.
Activated charcoal has a very large adsorptive surface and binds organic material without selectivity, including protein-coated particles the size of a phage. Taken at the same time it would be expected to remove the phage from the lumen before it reaches a host cell. Separating the two by several hours is the practical handling.
Clay minerals bind viral particles strongly enough that they are used industrially to strip viruses from water. A binder taken with a phage preparation would be expected to reduce the number of active particles reaching the colon. This is a physical interaction rather than a biological one, and spacing doses is the answer.
A phage capsid is built entirely from protein subunits, and gastric pepsin cleaves protein at acidic pH. Supplemental pepsin adds to that proteolytic load at exactly the point where the phage is most vulnerable. An enteric capsule addresses the same problem from the formulation side.
Trypsin and chymotrypsin in a pancreatic enzyme blend act on protein substrates in the small intestine, which is where a released phage particle travels. Adding protease at that stage is a plausible route to losing active particles before the colon. The interaction is mechanistic; it has not been quantified for this preparation.
Multi-enzyme blends usually carry protease activity across a range of pH values. That activity does not distinguish a dietary protein from a viral capsid protein. Where both are in one formula, delayed-release protection of the phage is the usual design answer.
Butyrate is what the desirable fermenters produce, and it is the main energy substrate for colonic epithelial cells. A phage preparation aims at the community composition upstream of that production. Supplying butyrate directly and shaping the community are different levers on the same endpoint.
Lactoferrin binds iron tightly and interacts with the lipopolysaccharide layer of Gram-negative cells, which is the same envelope a coliphage targets. Whether that binding helps or hinders phage adsorption at the receptor is not established, so the direction of any real interaction is open. The pairing appears in gut formulas on the shared Gram-negative rationale.
Saccharomyces boulardii is a yeast and carries none of the bacterial surface receptors a phage recognises, so a phage cannot infect it. The two are paired in gut formulas on that compatibility. The compatibility is established biology; a combined effect is not something the available sourcing establishes.
Talk to a doctor before taking Myoviridae LH01 if any of these apply to you: Individual strain not studied in isolation, Bacteriophage therapy is still emerging. These are flags to check first, not effects Myoviridae LH01 is known to cause.
Not medical advice. Show the label to your pharmacist.The whole-food sources on file. A supplement closes the gap, it does not replace dinner.
A gram-for-gram figure (how much of each you would eat to match a dose) will appear here once it is sourced and reviewed. This page will not print a number it cannot cite.
These are the studies our verdict leans on, chosen from the 8 we read for Myoviridae LH01. The full linked list is below.
FDA Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult your healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.