A pairing appears on this page only when a trial gave both ingredients together and measured the result. Nasturtium has none that clears that bar.
Stitching two separate single-ingredient studies into a pairing is the one thing this engine will not do. When a study of the combination itself holds up at source, it lands here with its citation.
No invented synergy. Where actives were studied on their own rather than together, the record shows each on its own evidence, never a combined effect no trial measured.
Research strength. Research strength says how much work stands behind the combination. It is never a product score.
Independent record. Every finding is cited to a named trial, dated, and never written by the brand.
20 pairings are live across the library today. Checked 20 July 2026.
No study gave these as a pair, so they are not in the card above. But the reason they belong together is settled biochemistry, not a guess, so it is worth knowing.
The isothiocyanates from nasturtium and watercress leaf, chiefly benzyl and phenethyl isothiocyanate, share a mechanism with sulforaphane from broccoli. Both are electrophiles that modify Keap1 cysteines and increase transcription of phase II detoxification enzymes. Combining them raises total isothiocyanate exposure rather than adding a separate mechanism. This is mechanistic reasoning, not an outcome measured for the pair.
Glucosinolates are stable and largely inert until myrosinase hydrolyses them. Products that pair a glucosinolate source with retained plant myrosinase convert more of the load than heat-processed material does. Pairing two glucosinolate sources raises substrate, and the conversion step remains the limiting factor.
Cooking or hot-air drying inactivates the plant enzyme, so conversion then depends on colonic bacteria. Several common gut species hydrolyse glucosinolates, and conversion varies widely between people. A probiotic does not guarantee conversion, and the size of the effect in humans is not settled.
Green leafy plants carry nitrate that oral bacteria reduce to nitrite. In gastric acid, ascorbate drives the further reduction of nitrite to nitric oxide instead of allowing nitrosation chemistry. The chemistry is settled; whether the pairing changes anything a person notices is a separate question.
Watercress and other Brassicaceae leaves sit in the moderate to high nitrate band, and beetroot is the usual concentrated source. Taken together they raise total nitrate load rather than acting on different targets. Anyone tracking nitrate intake for a clinical reason should count both.
Some glucosinolate degradation routes yield thiocyanate ion, which is a recognised competitive inhibitor of iodide uptake into the thyroid. The competition matters most when iodine intake is already low. At ordinary culinary intakes with adequate iodine it is a labelling point rather than a practical problem.
The mercapturic acid pathway is the main route of isothiocyanate clearance, and glutathione is consumed in the first step. Glutathione S-transferase genotype changes how fast that clearance runs, which is one reason human responses to cruciferous intake differ. Read this as pharmacology, not as a reason to take the two together.
Phylloquinone sits in the chloroplast, so dark green leaves carry meaningful amounts. Anyone whose vitamin K intake is monitored by a clinician should count leaf intake alongside a supplement rather than only the capsule. The point is consistency of intake, not avoidance.
Lutein, beta-carotene and phylloquinone all partition into mixed micelles, and micelle formation depends on dietary fat and bile. A leaf eaten with no fat at all gives up much less of these compounds. Any fat source works; the medium chain triglyceride is convenience rather than a special property.
Watercress grown in selenium-containing water can carry selenomethionine and related forms, so raw material selenium content is not fixed. Both selenium status and isothiocyanates feed into cellular antioxidant defence, though by different routes. Treated as a compositional note, not a demonstrated combination effect.
Nothing specific on file for Nasturtium. Match the label to the daily amount above, and tell your doctor what you take.
Not medical advice. Show the label to your pharmacist.These are the studies our verdict leans on, chosen from the 7 we read for Nasturtium. The full linked list is below.
1 source behind our Nasturtium verdict: peer-reviewed studies and registered clinical trials. Every one links straight to PubMed, the journal, or ClinicalTrials.gov. Read them yourself.
Evidence surfaced via Semantic Scholar (Allen Institute for AI) and ClinicalTrials.gov. Ranked by study type and citation weight, not cherry-picked.
Read this carefully. These are 1,159 voluntary, unverified reactions reported to the FDA (openFDA). The number mostly reflects how popular Nasturtium is, not how risky it is. A report is not proof Nasturtium caused anything. It is a signal of what to watch for, nothing more.
Source: openFDA adverse-event reports. Voluntary reporting, not an incidence rate.
FDA Disclaimer: These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This information is for educational purposes only and is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease. Consult your healthcare provider before starting any supplement regimen.